The students who do well in English 101 tend to be the
students who already know how to do most of this stuff. But what about the
others – those who come in as almost blank slates, having never read any more
than was absolutely necessary to scrape by. (And don’t fool yourself into
thinking that included all the books assigned in high school. There is no need
to buy Cliff’s Notes anymore. Just Google the title to get a complete short
synopsis.) These are students who string endless clauses together in their
writing, put apostrophes where they don’t belong and not where they do, and
either don’t use commas at all or spill boxes of them all over the page.
But before I can even hope to correct any of these issues, I
first have to try to get them to care
because half the students sitting in front of me are only there because someone
told them they needed to be. They don’t know what they want to do in life. They
are trying to get their basic classes “out of the way.” But not knowing what
“the way” is, they once again do the bare minimum, or what they think is the
bare minimum, not realizing that the standard for just barely not failing is
higher in college. These are the students who complain about college being “13th
grade” when they are the ones who make it that way. I don’t wish to suggest
that all my students are like this, but they are ones I worry about. They take
other classes in which they do scrape by, and someday – perhaps – they may
actually graduate from this college. In that eventuality, given that in 15
weeks there is no way they can learn what should essentially have been the
entire K-12 curriculum (taken to a higher level, of course, because this is college), what do they need to know
and be able to do that it is actually possible for me to teach them in this
amount of time?
Well, what do average people need to know how to do in “the
real world”? For one thing, it would be nice if they could send a clear email
that could be recognized as English. (There’s your drafting, revising, and
editing.) But of course they laugh when I tell them that I will sometimes go
over an email 10 times before I send it. I do it because I want to make sure
the message will be received as I intended. Then again, I have had lots of
experience with badly received emails, both as the sender and the recipient.
Sending a well-written email is an essential life skill.
Imagine reading this from a college student:
hi I dont know when I’ll be back in class but what did imiss last week ….
hi I dont know when I’ll be back in class but what did imiss last week ….
Students also laugh at me when I tell them that when I find
a typo in my work I feel like I’m standing in front of the world in my
underwear. Considering what we see on TV and on YouTube (and in emails like the
above), they probably think that’s a good thing!
The academic research papers are a part of the curriculum I
wonder about. The pieces of the process are important – being able to find good
information, read it with understanding, and use it to make an argument – but
does it have to be 8 to 10 pages? Does it have to have five sources? Does it have
to be documented in MLA style? Is MLA style (or APA or any of the specialized
documentation systems) even relevant anymore when almost all the sources
students use are electronic and can be Googled in the time it takes to flip to
their works cited page?
And then there’s course content. English 101 is a skill
class, with almost no inherent content. We are not after all, going to write about writing. So I want to use content
that opens their eyes to the world they’re preparing to enter – things like
income inequality, consumer manipulation by media, wars around the world, and
their chances of getting a decent job when they graduate. I also want to fill
them with the beauty of the world – of nature and art and human beings
(sometimes) and great writing. And most of all I want them to care about all this. In fact if they do
end up caring, that might almost be enough to make up for all the other stuff.
Almost.
The problem is that the fun stuff, the stuff that helps make
them care, is not the same stuff that teaches them how to write good emails or
read a scientific article that might help them weigh the pros and cons of
different treatments for their husband’s cancer or their MS or their child’s
epilepsy. But those things can be easily learned if one wants to learn. If there were just one thing that I could teach,
even at the expense of everything else, it would be a desire to learn. If I got
two things, the second would be persistence. If my students got both those
things from my class, that would be enough.
Right on cue, as I am
writing this, my husband walks in, and our daughter asks why he was watching a
documentary about Emma Goldman for the second time. His answer: “Because I want
to learn something.”
The desire to learn, once ignited, is not easily quenched. I
have exhausted myself this past year. I was so grateful to turn 46 in November
because I felt like I had been 45 for 10 years. I was – still am – so tired
that sometimes I just sit and stare at nothing. And yet as soon as I pick up a
book, suddenly I want to know something. Sitting down to start planning English
101 for the spring, which was a chore I’ve been putting off for weeks, was what
triggered me to write this post, when I’ve had no desire to write anything in
months. Suddenly I’m asking questions and looking for answers – in the
textbooks and websites I went through this afternoon and now in the web of my
own words. And I have found my answer. What is enough to teach? A desire to
learn and the persistence to do what it takes to learn. Now I just have to learn how to teach those
things. I suspect it will be harder than teaching where the apostrophe goes or
how to document a source in MLA style. I hope I can be a good enough teacher to
do it.
You want to know something? Well, first we love you, and that is never enough.
ReplyDeleteSecond, from my experience as an environmental educator, we care and save what we love. So, what is it they are passionate about? What doo they love? What problem would they like to solve if they could? I would start right there, asking these questions to my students and then make them work on it... With love, because there is never enough love in this world,
Emmanuelle
This thinking is exactly why you're an excellent educator!!
ReplyDeleteIt's a funny thing about life; if you refuse to accept anything but the best, you very often get it.
ReplyDeleteW. Somerset Maugham
To write is to right--to straighten things out; to put them straight; to take them from topsy-turvey to topsy-topsy (:-)). I love it when you write! It's always with love!
ReplyDeleteDad